"Newsflash Balancing Home Office with Office Work (June 2020)"

Newsflash Balancing Home Office with Office Work (June 2020)

Published: (Wed) 03 Jun 2020

Although the state of emergency has been lifted for the entire territory of Japan on 25 May 2020, the health risks related to COVID-19 persist, and many companies have chosen to continue teleworking (or working from home, “home office”) in one way or another. In this Newsflash we discuss some legal questions resulting from these changes at the workplace and the consequences for employer and employees.

1: Home Office
Q 1.1: Is an employer granting commutation allowance to its employees entitled to stop the payment thereof, if employees are working from home, or to reduce the amount of the allowance? Has the employer a right to request a refund of already paid commutation allowance to home office employees?

  • The payment of a commutation allowance is not mandatory under the Labor Standards Act and a respective payment obligation arises only when such obligation is explicitly stipulated in the employment rules or in the employment agreement(s) of the employee(s) concerned.Often, employment rules stipulate that a commutation allowance is paid to cover the actual costs incurred for commutation to the workplace, subject to submission of respective evidence (e.g. a copy of the commuting pass, etc.). In such case, it is principally feasible to stop payment for periods during which employees are ordered to work entirely from home, because actual commuting expenses do not incur.On the other hand, if employees work only partially from home, and commute to the company on certain days, the employer needs to continue paying the monthly commuting allowance with respect to already purchased commuting passes (since such passes usually are not refunded by the transportation companies in case of usage during several days of a month only). However, if the employer instructs the employees not to purchase commuting passes in the future, but only to use one-time tickets, it is feasible to reduce the monthly commutation allowance to the actual commutation expenses incurred for the days on which the employee actually commutes to the work place.
  • A refund obligation of employees to return their already paid commutation allowance to the company will most likely not be legally enforceable if contested by the employees, unless a refund obligation has been explicitly stipulated in the employment rules or employment contract in the event certain conditions for receiving such allowance (e.g. submission of evidence) are not met.


Continue Reading (PDF)

More Newsletters…

Newsletter Reform of German Competition Law (April 2021)

Part 1: Unburdening small and medium-sized companies

The German Act Against Restraints of Competition (“Competition Act”) has been amended to address challenges of the digital economy, to make merger control more efficient for small and medium-sized companies, and to implement EU legislation. This reform of January 2021 concerns several aspects that are of relevance to foreign investors. Those aimed at unburdening small and medium-sized companies will be outlined in this newsletter. A subsequent newsletter will give an overview of the tightened antitrust rules for “Big Data” companies.

read more

Newsletter Re-Employment after Retirement Age (March 2021)

Japan is one of the world’s most rapidly ageing societies. Along with the traditionally high life expectancy, the country’s fertility rate is at a continuously low level. According to the Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, as of September 2020, nearly 30% of Japanese are already 65 years or older. The effects of this demographic change are noticeable. Along with the increasing competition for qualified junior employees, the ageing workforce poses new challenges for employers.

read more

Newsletter Setting-up Business in Japan (February 2021)

Japan continues to attract the interest of foreign investors, wishing to establish or expand their own business presence in this market. Japanese corporate law provides for a broad variety of legal types of investment, the most prevalent of which are described in this newsletter. These include the representative office (I.), the branch (II.), the joint stock corporation (III.) and the limited liability company (IV.). Whereas the stock corporation traditionally enjoys the highest reputation with banks and business partners and for this reason is most frequently chosen for the establishment of a new legal entity, also the limited liability company has been gaining popularity due to its flexible structure and ease to administer.

read more