"Newsflash COVID-19 Effect on Commercial Contracts (March 2020)"

Newsflash COVID-19 Effect on Commercial Contracts (March 2020)

Published: (Thu) 05 Mar 2020

COVID-19 now forces domestic and foreign companies to assess if the performance of their ongoing contracts is still possible or cancellation needed, together with the various legal consequences arising therefrom. In this newsflash, we have addressed the following four imminent questions under Japanese law.

Q1: Do I have a cancellation right due to COVID-19 based on my contract?
This first depends on the provision(s) in the contract concerned. Many contracts stipulate cancellation rights of the party ordering goods or services in case of non-performance of a contractual obligation or in case of performance delays by the service provider/supplier. The service provider/supplier, on the other hand, is usually not entitled to cancel the contract in such case and may also be subject to damage compensation obligations vis-à-vis the party that ordered goods or services.

To balance the interests between the parties, international trade contracts often contain so-called force majeure clauses, stipulating that non-performance due to an unforeseeable or uncontrollable external event (sometimes also referred to as “act of god”) may trigger special legal rights and consequences as further defined in the contract. These can range from a one-sided extension of deadlines, or an adjustment of the contract, to liability exclusion or a right of cancellation for both parties of the contract. Depending on the wording of such clause COVID-19 may fall under the scope of force majeure.

Force majeure clauses often include specific examples of unforeseeable or uncontrollable events, such as natural disasters, strikes, riots, war, governmental measures or embargos etc., but often do not mention “infectious diseases” etc. specifically. If not expressly listed in the wording, diseases typically do not constitute a force majeure event, unless being covered by other listed events, such as “governmental measures” taken as a consequence of a disease, e.g. an order for all citizens to stay at home. Only if the force majeure wording includes terms, such as “infectious diseases”, “epidemics” etc., COVID-19 can be deemed to fall under the scope of the force majeure with the legal consequences described in the contract. Please note though that even if the force majeure clause expressly mentions “infectious disease” but does not define the threshold criteria, the legal consequences may not be triggered until the spread of the disease has reached a level that hinders the performance, for example in the case of lack of personnel due to high infection rates. This needs to be reviewed on a case by case basis.

If nothing in particular is stipulated in the contract, the general provisions of the applicable law apply. In this respect, please refer to Q3 below.

Q2: Does it make a difference at what time the contract was concluded?
Yes. Force majeure clauses do not apply to events that have already materialized prior to conclusion of the contract. Therefore, for contracts concluded after January 2020, and in particular after the WHO announcement dated 30 January 2020 declaring COVID-19 as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern”, the parties may be deemed to have been aware of the risk of COVID-19 and thus concluded the contract deliberately, as the developing situation and the risks were already publicly known. In this case, the parties are in principle not permitted to exercise rights based on a force majeure clause stipulated in the contract unless the incident falls under another category of force majeure.


Continue Reading (PDF)

More Newsletters…

Newsletter German Supply Chain Act (October 2021)

German Supply Chain Act

The new German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (the “Act”) introduces compliance obligations to prevent human rights and certain environmental risks along the entire value chain, from exploiting raw materials until delivering the final product to end customers. The Act follows a global trend of requiring companies to monitor their compliance with human rights and environmental core values.

read more

Newsletter Reform of German Competition Law Part 2 (May 2021)

Part 2: “Updating” the Competition Act

The recent amendment of the Competition Act is entitled “Act for Digitizing the Competition Act”. The German legislator is the first worldwide to address many of the challenges of digital ecosystems that have been discussed at global level over the past few years.

Public debate in Germany has focused on a new provision aimed at regulating “GAFA” (short for: Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon), the giants of the data economy (see below section 3).

read more

Newsletter Reform of German Competition Law (April 2021)

Part 1: Unburdening small and medium-sized companies

The German Act Against Restraints of Competition (“Competition Act”) has been amended to address challenges of the digital economy, to make merger control more efficient for small and medium-sized companies, and to implement EU legislation. This reform of January 2021 concerns several aspects that are of relevance to foreign investors. Those aimed at unburdening small and medium-sized companies will be outlined in this newsletter. A subsequent newsletter will give an overview of the tightened antitrust rules for “Big Data” companies.

read more